<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content vs. Presentation: Just How Deep Are The Social Networks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericdelabar.com/2008/04/content-vs-presentation-just-how-deep-are-the-social-networks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericdelabar.com/2008/04/content-vs-presentation-just-how-deep-are-the-social-networks.html</link>
	<description>Web 2.0 from a Web Purist and J2EE Developer</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrik</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdelabar.com/2008/04/content-vs-presentation-just-how-deep-are-the-social-networks.html#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdelabar.com/?p=44#comment-766</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, I didn't initially even identify this site as a blog until you explicitly mentioned it. I for one like it, no fancy stuff crudding up the screen, it is more "down to business"-like

But having that said (and shamelessly plugging StumbleUpon, through which I arrived at your site, as a better social tool) it does seem like the trend is "bling" over content. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, I didn&#8217;t initially even identify this site as a blog until you explicitly mentioned it. I for one like it, no fancy stuff crudding up the screen, it is more &#8220;down to business&#8221;-like</p>
<p>But having that said (and shamelessly plugging StumbleUpon, through which I arrived at your site, as a better social tool) it does seem like the trend is &#8220;bling&#8221; over content.&nbsp;:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.778 seconds -->
